Friday, February 22, 2008 | by nathan

Less About Lasagna and Mondays, More About Unadulterated Existential Dread

Garfield Minus Garfield

I hope that I’ve passed on to you, my dozen or so regular readers, my overzealous love for The Comics Curmudgeon and Marmaduke Explained. They’re both wonderful blogs that expose the comics pages for what they really are, most of the time: lazy cash cows taking up space on a page that, at its best, is capable of so, so, so much more. Comics writers, with a few notable - and mostly retired - exceptions, have become lazy hacks who only write their strips in the hope of cashing in on much-larger marketing deals.

The worst offender, of course, is Garfield, not least because you can see his smarmy cat-face on everything in sight, but because when Jim Davis is on his game - I dunno if he takes the occasional hit of crack or what - he actually can be funny. Most the time, however, like most of the artists on the funny pages, he’s just phoning it in, and I have no doubt that when he’s ready to hang it up he’ll just hand it off to some committee so his work can continue for decades to come instead of clearing out and letting someone with a newer, fresher idea take up residence.

So, I’ve found a new favorite comics blog: Garfield Minus Garfield. As you can see, without the annoying orange cat, the strip is just Jon Arbuckle showing himself for the manic-depressive, existentially terrified little man that he is. Here’s what the blog’s author has to say:

Who would have guessed that when you remove Garfield from the Garfield comic strips, the result is an even better comic about schizophrenia, bipolor disorder, and the empty desperation of modern life? Friends, meet Jon Arbuckle. Let’s laugh and learn with him on a journey deep into the tortured mind of an isolated young everyman as he fights a losing battle against lonliness and methamphetamine addiction in a quiet American suburb.

Everything about it is rewarding. Read on!

UPDATE: Check it out! I made one!

Garfield Minus

 

Interweb Comments (5)

Thursday, February 14, 2008 | by nathan

They All Play On the Golf Course and Drink Their Martinis Dry

Cary Tennis has probably written his best column to date. The headline is "Help! I’m a prisoner in a big suburban house!"

Here’s an excerpt. I highly recommend reading the whole thing:

You can’t put your finger on it but the place you are in does not make you happy. The place you are in is big and pretty. So that makes it hard to explain. Why does big and pretty not make you happy?

It doesn’t make you happy because it’s not made for humans. It’s made for cars. These suburban houses are basically huge garages with attached living quarters for servants — meaning us. We are the servants. We work for the cars who live there. The cars have a very good life. We make sure of that. But our lives are not so good there.

I do believe that suburban living is a form of torture. If you made suspected terrorists live in big suburban houses, they would talk eventually.

But they’d probably only say things like, "Have you seen my keys?"

Interweb Comments (0)

Wednesday, February 13, 2008 | by nathan

Tagged! The 123 Meme

D’oh!

The Palinode tagged me to do this meme. Normally I’m vociferously against these things, but what’s there to be done? I’ve been tagged. Also, with the crap-trolic week I’m having, it may be nice to have something to take my mind off everything that’s been going on. And to be honest, I kinda wanted to be tagged for this meme as soon as Schmutzie, the Palinode’s Awesome Wife, did it, because it sounds fun and fascinating. I’ve learned a lot since reading people’s entries.

So here we go:

THE RULES:

1. Pick up the nearest book (of at least 123 pages).
2. Open the book to page 123.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the next three sentences.
5. Tag five people.

Like Palinode, I don’t really understand why rules 3 & 4 aren’t combined, but as I believe that you mess with the rules at your own peril, I’m leaving it like it is.

Aside from the AP Style Guide (snooze!), the book nearest me is Marcus J. Borg’s The Heart of Christianity, which I am currently reading. OH! But when I turn to page 123, it’s nothing but footnotes. So, I’ll go to the next page? Which is also footnotes? And the one after that? And the next one isn’t footnotes but has only 7 sentences.

Finally, on page 127 we escape all this ridiculousness, and here are sentences 6-8:

"It began with the Roman Emperor Constantine’s embrace of Christianity and lasted until recently. During these centuries, the "powers that be" were Christian. So long as the wedding of Christianity and dominant culture continued, Christians seldom engaged in radical criticism of the social order."

Okay! I haven’t even read that far, so this complete lack of context is kinda fun. Here are 5 people I’d like to drag in:

1. CGHill from Dustbury

2. Kathleen from Unsettled

3. Helena from Sanctimony

4. J-Money from The Typing Makes Me Sound Busy, as long as she remembers that THIS IS NOT IDOL.

5. Sarah from Que Sera Sera

I’m sure all 5 of you have better things to be doing, but jump in with us and enjoy.

library, Interweb Comments (5)

Saturday, February 2, 2008 | by nathan

We Have A Winner!

As you can see, we have a winner!

All the entries were awesome, and believe me, if I could divy up my dog somehow, or live without my allergy meds this time of year, you’d all be getting prizes. But considering that Jelisa’s entry made me ACTUALLY wet my pants a little, I figured I owed her one.

The runner-up is Bach, whose entry "Coming To You Live From the Crucible of Domesticity" is very likely to get used sometime in the future. So Jelisa and Ben … er, ah, Bach, you guys e-mail me your addresses (just put my first name, then one of those kicky "at" signs, then okaycity.com), and I’ll get your prizes to you!

And what do they win, you may ask?

Well. You were both going to get my d*** in a box, but the USPS has a real "problem" with people "mailing" their "genatalia," and also, Brian won’t share. I dunno, take it up with him.

So, for our grand prize winner Jelisa, we have a lovely DVD box set of Wonderfalls, because I have three of them. BECAUSE I’M SO WORRIED THEY’RE GOING TO STOP MAKING THEM THAT I BOUGHT THREE. And I can part with one for a line that good. Also, I’m going to bake you a pan of cinammon rolls if I can figure out how to mail them so they don’t get all smooshy.

Ben, you, too, get cinnamon rolls, as well as a printed, framed photo of your choice from my Flickr set. So pick one out, e-mail me, and let me know. I’ll get it printed and framed and send it on to ya!

Thanks everybody for your contributions. Did you guys like this contest? Should I continue to milk your creativity in exchange for goods and/or services?

Sweeeet, Interweb Comments (1)

Wednesday, January 30, 2008 | by nathan

A Contest: Help Me Write A Non-Lame Banner Slogan, Win A Prize!

So, I’ve been having trouble with my new February banner. Here it is, in all its glory: (click to see a bigger version!)

Blank

It looks okay, right? Now, first off, I have to say that I really like this month’s banner. In case you’ve never looked closely, it’s a photo of a "Smile: Jesus Loves You!" tract in the urinal at my office. Very funny stuff, though I’m sure I’ve been downgraded to Economy seats once I get to heaven. I’ll be in the smoking section, far from the dessert cart.

Anyway, I really like the look of February’s banner, but I’m fresh out of ideas for stuff to fill that big blank space under the title, there. Oh, and I’ve tried:

Bill Clinton

That’s funny, right? "Utilizing the power of poop jokes to fight the great good fight. Just like Bill Clinton." But, given my recent disappointment with our former President, and the fact that I really don’t deserve to be compared to him in any way (take that how you like), I’m not sure about that one. Also, this site has been severely lacking in poop jokes lately, though I plan to remedy that in February.

So, I tried this one:

Vagina

Which, while funny, could get me in some trouble. After all, I can’t credibly claim to know what anything that comes from a cat’s vagina tastes like, and I honestly hope to baby Jesus that you can’t, either.

Now you can see the wheels are falling off the whole venture:

Batmobile

I mean, c’mon. That’s not even funny.

So anyway, I’m leaving it to you, dear readers, and I seriously need some help. This banner will have to be completely redesigned if I don’t have some great slogan to stick in there. So I’m appealing to you guys, who, in general, are much funnier than I am. Give me something - anything - to stick in that slot. (Tee hee!) Whoever comes up with the funniest, kickiest, most hilarious slogan - whoever makes me pee a little in my pants - will win a prize. I’ll bake you something, I’ll send you some origami balls or a blackberry cobbler, or some cookies, or some of my allergy meds, or maybe Sam.

No, you can’t have Sam. The postage would bankrupt me, and who would lick my face?

But SOMETHING. I’ll come up with a prize - or a selection of prizes - later. Just leave your slogan in the comments section of this post by 5 p.m. Central Time on Friday. I’ll be in Tulsa, taking my mom to see Reba McEntire and Kelly Clarkson in concert (ha ha, shut up), but when I get back I’ll sort through them all and decide the best one. There also will probably be a prize or two for honorable mention. So there’s that. Help me out here, internets. I did that thing for you, remember?

Sweeeet, Interweb Comments (17)

Friday, January 25, 2008 | by nathan

My Interview With Margalit

One of the best things about being a part of the huge blogosphere is that you meet people whose lives are so different than yours, and if you read their words and get invested in their lives, you’re guaranteed to learn some things.

I got to interview Margalit for the Interview Project. I was interviewed by Kathleen, who really raised the bar for questions; I hope Margalit had as much fun answering the questions I sent her as I had answering the ones Kathleen sent me. Margalit is witty and hilarious. She lives in Massachusetts with her teenage twins, Barney Frank is her congressman, and she totally sent me a recipe for latkes! Anyway, on top of reading this interview I hope you’ll check out her blog; it’s really wonderful. She’s given me a lot to think about with respect to poverty, and diversity, and parenting.

1.) I’m not Jewish, but I LOVE latkes. How do you make them?

I grate the potatoes and onions in the food processor, which would seriously disappoint my grandmother who said that every latke should have some knuckle blood from the hand grater to make it authentic. Once they are grated I drain the mixture and squeeze out every bit of water I can, and then dry the mixture off with towels. When it’s very dry, I add flour, salt and pepper and eggs. I mix that all up together, and then add oil to a hot pan. I like the oil to be about 1/2 way up a large saute pan. When the oil is hot hot hot, I drop in a large spoonful of the latke mix and let it brown on one side. When it’s completely brown, I turn them over and brown the other side. Drain on paper towels and put each batch on a plate in a warm oven until all are fried.

Serve with sour cream and apple sauce.

This is the recipe I use, but I don’t fry in olive oil as it doesn’t get hot enough. I use vegetable oil:

POTATO LATKE RECIPE

* 2 lb. russet potatoes
* 1 medium onion, pureed (about 1 cup)
* 2 large egg
* 1 tsp. salt
* 1/2 cup flour (or matzo meal)

* Pure olive oil for frying (not extra virgin)

Peel potatoes and shred in food processor (or, if appliance-challenged, with a box grater). Place potato shreds in a bowl and submerge in cold water for five minutes. Drain, then place in a clean kitchen towel, roll up, and twist forcefully to press juices out. (Use a kitchen towel you don’t like, as potato juice stains.) Set potato shreds aside.

If you are multiplying this recipe, keep the ingredients separated until ready to fry. Then, mix latke batter in single-recipe increments and fry (as described below), and repeat until completed.

Combine potato shreds, eggs, onion puree, salt, and flour — mix thoroughly.

In large skillet, heat 1/2 cup olive oil to 350-degrees. By heaping tablespoons, spoon batter into hot oil and press slightly into latke shape. Do not crowd the pan, as doing so will detrimentally lower the oil temperature — fry about five or six latkes at a time, depending on pan size. Cook five minutes, until brown on bottom, them flip and cook five minutes more. Place on paper towels to drain.

If you are multiplying this recipe, add more olive oil as necessary and be sure to maintain proper oil temperature. Also, you may need to add more flour (by the tablespoon) if the batter gets soggy.

If eating immediately, place drained latkes in a warm (250-degree) oven until ready to eat. If freezing, placed drained latkes in a storage container or foil tray, separating layers of latkes with wax paper, and freeze. To reheat, place latkes in a single layer on a baking sheet and bake at 350-degrees for 10-15 minutes until heated-through.


2.) What would you say Mike Huckabee’s IQ is? Like 10 or so, right?

Oh, it’s hard to say. I’m guessing maybe like 65 or 70. Very below average but the guy isn’t drooling. I do wonder how he actually got elected as Governor of Arkansas. But then again, it IS Arkansas. His knowledge of geography is chilling, though.

3.) I have to say, my favorite thing about your blog is the honesty and transparency with which you write about parenting your teenage twins. Do they know about or read your website?

Yes, they both know about it, and my son reads it pretty much daily. My daughter isn’t much of a reader so if there is something of interest to her, I’ll read it to her, but for the most part she’s not interested. Some of my son’s friends read it as well. My kids tell me if there is something they don’t want me to blog, and I do respect that. So the look you get is often missing key pieces of our daily lives. Additionally, I don’t use their names or the names of their friends or teachers. I’ve been tempted, believe me, but I don’t. It’s pretty easy to figure out where we live, but it’s a city of 90K people with two large high schools so I don’t much worry that the loonys are out for my kids. It’s more important to me that I respect my kids while still painting a funny picture of them.

4.) What, if anything, do you think is missing from the community of parenting bloggers?

Lots, actually. I think that most of the parenting bloggers have younger kids and the whole focus of their blogs is on babys and toddlers. I’m so not interested in potty training, and after you’ve read the same old potty posts 3000 times, it’s just boring. I also think there is a HUGE divide between the people who have been blogging a long time and those that have started in the past year or so. Fortunately, most of the superstars of two years ago have either dropped out or lost popularity so there is a new group of fabulous bloggers who have broken out recently. I love that. This new group of A-list bloggers are so much more inclusive and friendly than the original popular bloggers, so it appears that everyone seems more welcomed, and happier. Most of the backstabbing has stopped, and everyone feels free to promote their new escapades in blogging without being compared to X, Y or Z.

5.) I saw that you recently read Michael Chabon’s "The Yiddish Policemen’s Union." I’m reading that, too, and it’s kinda killing me. So, I guess my question is, what’s a book that you read that changed your life?

There are actually two. The first, "What’s Bred in the Bone", by Robertson Davies, opened my eyes up to a wonderful and dynamic world of art forgery, crooked curators, and how art is used as a political force in conflicts. It got me to researching a lot of the historical cases of art forgery, and to read up on such luminaries at the turn of the century like Bernard Berenson.

The second book is "East Lynne" by Mrs Henry Wood. This is the first sensation novel ever written, and it got me interested in all of the sensation novelists, especially the women like Elizabeth Garret. East Lynne is a real tear-jerker, and it was such a popular book in it’s time it was made into a West End play that was the most popular play of it’s day. In addition, when you know about the book (it’s very obscure) and read Victorian fiction, you note that many of the heroines in the novels are reading East Lynne, much to the chagrin of their guardians.

6.) I love when you talk politics, because you’re the most no-nonsense person I’ve read in awhile. If you were President tomorrow, what 3 things would you do?

1. Revamp the way poverty is defined in this country. As of today, they are still using figures from 1965 to define poverty, even though the numbers are insanely out of date. In addition, I would work to change how food stamps, welfare, SSDI, and other government programs are given to the poor. This country has a terrible habit of hating it’s poor, and that needs to STOP.

2. I would work hard to change the way reportage is handled in this country. I think the way the media has gotten so lazy, and has become so into reporting things in a factually incorrect manner because they are too lazy to check their facts needs to stop. Media has, for example, forgotten the John Edwards is running for President. He is rarely if ever mentioned, which directly affects his ability to run a decent campaign. I hate that. This would, of course, involve uniting the various factions in the congress, who are so far apart that it’s hard to imagine what could bring them together.

3. Health care for all. I believe in Universal Health Care. I believe that insurance companies are running and ruining this country. It is heinous that so many millions of Americans can’t even get decent health care, and that so many more have been mistreated, misdiagnosed, and refused care that their doctors deem necessary by insurance morons who know absolutely  nothing about health care. My ideal would be to totally dismantle insurance companies. If they want to bilk homeowners and car owners out of money by overinsuring and then denying claims, as they did apres Katrina, they should be shut down. If they continue to lie and run shady companies with little reason to exist beyond them making money, they should be shut down. There is no altruism left in the corporate world, and eventually I’d go for huge changes in the oversight of corporate America, making them run honestly and with the consumer as their prime concern, rather than their own pocketbooks.

Um, can you tell that I was a red diaper baby? :-)

7.) So - how about that Tom Cruise?

Oy, talk about a trainwreck. What a complete and utter asswipe he is. WHY do people still pay him by seeing his movies. He’s an embarrassment to the real talented actors.

8.) Can I just tell you how cool it is that Barney Frank is your congressman? My congressman is a moron. All that to say - what’s Barney Frank really like?

He’s hilarious. I mean really really funny. When he’s home, he gets to be the nice Jewish guy he really is. I attended a bris once where he was also a guest and he was telling one bris joke after another. The poor moyel was in hysterics and it took forever to circumcise the poor baby. He lives in Washington more than around here, but when he’s in town, he’s always visiting the high schools and talking to people around town. He’s very friendly and again, funny as hell.

9.) As a fellow insomniac I completely identify with your frequent lack of sleep. What things do you wish would be open, go on, or be shown at night to help the time pass?

I wish they would have marathons of 24, LOST, and House on TV. Or actually marathons of anything would be better than those damn infomercials. I watch a LOT of PBS late at night since it’s usually the only thing on. At 3 the ABC news comes on, and I will  fall asleep to that most nights.

We have a small store down the block that closes at 11 and I wish they would stay open later. And freaking takeout. We have the worst takeaway in our city. One mediocre Chinese place and 1 really bad Chinese place. Many pizza places. That’s pretty much it. I wish Mighty Subs was open 24 hours. I really really wish Mighty Subs was open 24 hours. Instead, it’s open like 3 hours/day, and mostly when I can’t get there. If they delivered I’d be so freaking happy.

10.) What advice would you give to people who are just starting a new blog?

A friend of mine IRL just started her blog about 3 or 4 months ago. Besides giving her advice about her blog design, and how to attract readers, I talked a lot about having a thick skin, and ho not to take some of the negative stuff in the blogosphere to heart. It’s a virtual world. Make sure that you have a clear comment policy, blog about what really interests you, show your passion for the topic or topics, write well, spell check, and keep on slogging. I remember a few years back telling my therapist (also a reader) that I’d be so happy when I got 200 hits/day. That was my goal back then. Now I’d be upset if I got 200 hits/day. So it’s all relative. I guess as long as you’re not telling secrets that can come back to bite you, or libeling someone, then just be yourself. Some people will hate you, some people will love you, and eventually you’ll find your footing, your audience, and your blogging community!

Many thanks to you, Margalit, for such wonderful answers.

Interweb Comments (5)

Friday, January 25, 2008 | by nathan

What I Have To Say For Myself

I love blogging for so many reasons, not the least of which is that I get to meet some incredibly cool people, people who are so incredibly nice, who send me concerned e-mails when I post something scary or sad, people who write to ask how Sam is doing in his crate (we’ve abandoned it altogether and everyone is happier and more well-adjusted for it, thank you), people who say they’ve tried my chili recipe and really liked it.

So when I read on Neil Kramer’s blog about The Interview Project, I was pretty stoked. Here’s what he has to say about it:

Did you ever notice that whenever some expert is being interviewed on Oprah or the Today show, the person just happens to have a book coming out the following week?  It’s as it wasn’t important to tell us the cure for cancer until the guy’s book comes out, and then they don’t even tell you the cure so you have to buy the book.  I’ve seen some bloggers being interviewed by other bloggers.  It’s usually the same as it is on TV.  Those interviewed are persons deemed “worthy” of being asked important questions about the world.  They have a popular blog, a project coming out, or a specific expertise.  We instantly find these people even MORE interesting because someone took the time to interview them. It’s like Obama’s campaign didn’t even start until Oprah sat down to talk with him.  All of a sudden, everyone went, “Wow, she finds him interesting. He MUST be interesting.”  I know most of you won’t agree with me, but I think anyone who decides to write about their life online is interesting, even those who may not do the best job yet of conveying that on paper.  We all should be interviewed, at least once.

So the whole deal is that you go to his blog and sign up via the comments, and everyone interviews the person who signed up after they did. I admit to having been a little worried about who I’d get, but it turned out I got Kathleen, whose blog, Unsettled, is very cool, and which you should read. She sent me some questions earlier this week, and I did my best to answer them. You can read the whole interview here. To whet your appetite I want to post this one little excerpt for you:

Tell us about the first time you ever got paid to write something. Bonus points for including the link if it is available.

In high school I won a couple writing contests that came with cash prizes. One was from the American Jewish Federation, but you didn’t have to be Jewish to enter the contest, and I won a $300 scholarship from it. Then, at the end of the year, my high school had a program where they "presented" you with all the scholarships you were getting, and the principal - who hated me - made sure everyone knew that I’d entered this "Jewish" contest, even though I wasn’t "Jewish." He totally made it sound like I’d defrauded the entire Jewish faith for a paltry $300, and I got a lot of disapproving looks from my peers and their parents.

I’ve interviewed Margalit. I spent a whole lot of time reading her blog, and I have to say, it fascinated me to no end. I’m planning on actually reading the whole thing back-to-front this weekend. I’ll post the interview later today, but in the meantime I’d advise going over to her site and reading for yourself; she’s awesome.

Interweb Comments (2)

Wednesday, January 16, 2008 | by nathan

Into Thin Air

Air

I’m what you might call a novice techie. I feel that I’ve run every inch of the gamut from luddite to technophile, including the high point of the swing this past summer when I briefly considered marrying my iPhone and then just carrying on a summer affair with Brian.

The other night on the way to the gym I snapped at Brian, which I felt terrible about, and which was absolutely wrong, but hear me out:

One of my major goals for this year has been to increase the flow and organization of our house, to just generally make it a more livable, vital place where we actually do the things we tell ourselves we’re going to, and we clean up once we’re finished. We have a problem with these things. To that effect, I hung one of the 100,000 reporter’s notebooks I own from the kitchen wall, and anytime we come up with something we need at the store, we write it down. We look at it every day. We add to it, and when someone goes to the store, he rips the sheet off the notebook and takes it with him.

Brian mentioned that he could easily set up something like that for us online, so if we’re at work, say, and headed to Target over lunch break - a favorite activity of his - we wouldn’t have to think to grab the sheet THAT MORNING, or otherwise try to remember what’s on it.

And I lost it, a little. Maybe it was my recent interaction with my favorite old philosophy professor, but the idea of having something as simple an innocuous as a grocery list on the internet just seemed ridiculous to me.

"I don’t want to use technology for EVERYTHING!" I shouted in the car. I shouldn’t have done that; it was uncalled-for. Things immediately got awkward.

I apologized profusely, then tried to explain myself.

I like having a physical connection with things, especially with words and things I need to remember. Physically writing things down helps me to remember them so much more than typing them or entering them in an internet form. Sometimes I log on to this very website and go, "Wait, when the hell did I write that? Did someone hack my site?" Then I see my gratuitous overuse of the caps lock key and think, oh, yeah, right.

I could never go to a class and type my notes on a laptop; this likely disqualifies me from most major moneymaking grad schools, but oh the hell well. At work people are constantly asking me, "Should I send you an Outlook invitation? Why don’t you publish your Outlook calendar? Could you just let me know through Outlook, EVEN THOUGH I’M STANDING HERE TALKING TO YOU AND YOU JUST TOLD ME?"

People! It HELPS me to write stuff down! To physically get a pen, and physically get a piece of paper, and make words, with my penmanship (which is pretty great, by the way, because I’ve spent decades perfecting it). That puts the info into my brain. Some of the people at my job - I love them - but when I tell them it’s easier for me to write it down on a post-it, they look at me like I’ve said, "You know what will help me remember that meeting next week? If I go outside and slaughter a couple of squirrels; excuse me."

The point is, there’s absolutely no reason to try to use technology for every single thing we do, and it drives me crazy that people are constantly trying to do exactly that.

Today Brian asked me what we needed at Target, and I remembered our grocery list, and rattled it off to him via iChat; in a good marriage, one person is weak where the other is strong, and we complement one another quite well.

Some people are more apt to remember things by writing them down; some people like having it on the internet where they can refer back to it at a moment’s notice; I just hope the former isn’t completely ever replaced by the latter, or else you’ll find me walking in circles in some foreign city, wondering, "How did this happen?"

So then, also, yesterday, we were introduced to the MacBook Air, a really transformative little piece of technology. I’m not going to get one; my little MacBook is more than adequate for my needs, but I thought it was interesting, the sort of vision of the future of personal computing that the MacWorld keynote showed. We’ve all known for awhile that the optical drive is on its way out, as downloads become faster, and media files rise in quality. This will mean that personal computers will get smaller and smaller, which is nice, and that they’ll have more room for hard-drive and RAM. Also nice.

My guess is in the next decade we’ll see a near-complete unification of the personal home computer and entertainment hub. Content will come largely through computers to our televisions, and will be available to transfer to our portable devices - laptops as well as iPhones, iPods, etc.

There’s something in the air, for sure, and I think yesterday’s keynote painted a clearer picture of it. I thought it was especially interesting that the Time Capsule is one of the first consumer-oriented products featuring 1 TB of storage; they just keep getting bigger, and, paradoxically, smaller. I imagine that in a year of two iPods will sync wirelessly. The real money to be made going forward is software that keeps one’s home computer/entertainment hub, laptop and mobile devices synced automatically. If you invent that, you don’t have to give me credit, but would you mind terribly to pay off my mortgage?

At any rate, it’ll be interesting to see how certain things fare going forward. I know it’s not very eco-friendly to say, but a completely paperless society is my idea of pure hell.

Mac, Interweb Comments (2)

Tuesday, January 8, 2008 | by nathan

Fun With Memes: Because I Have Time For Little Else, and I’m An Efficient Time-Waster

I’m working on literally 100,000 things today, but I read this and had to participate. It comes from Dustbury.

This one sounds simple, ends up less so. The idea: create a fake band and their first album. Here’s how it works:

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    The first article title on the page is the name of your band.
  2. http://www.quotationspage.com/random.php3
    The last four words of the very last quote is the title of your album.
  3. http://www.flickr.com/explore/interesting/7days/
    The third picture, no matter what it is, will be your album cover.

 

So when I clicked each of these links, here’s what I got:

1. The Band Name

2. The Album Title (last four words of the last quote - scroll down). In case it doesn’t work, here’s the quote:

Thus the metric system did not really catch on in the States, unless you count the increasing popularity of the nine-millimeter bullet.
Dave Barry (1947 - )

I’m adding one bit to this meme, which is that the title of your first single comes from the last sentence of the quote above that; thus, Aguazul’s first single, from the album "The Nine-Millimeter Bullet," is titled "You Must Set Yourself On Fire."

Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion. You must set yourself on fire.
Reggie Leach

3. The Photo, from awesome Flickr user I.G. (Sirentia).

Mine ended up being pretty damn cool, so I wanted to share it. I engaged in a bit of photoshoppage on the photo to make it look more like a CD. So, here you go:

Aguazul: The Nine-Millimeter Bullet

Aguazul are embarking on their world tour next week starting in Tokyo. They’ll play across southeast Asia and into Europe in time for the Glastonbury Festival. Following that they’ll hit the U.S. in the fall, then play out the year in a series of small club dates in Canada.

Try this for yourself; it’s pretty fun! Post me links to your results in my comments section. I’m seriously thinking that this might become the name and photo of my yearly mixed CD that I send to lucky friends.

Interweb Comments (8)

Sunday, January 6, 2008 | by nathan

Now With 16% More Blasphemy!

You may have noticed that we’ve decided to spread out here a little at Okay City. The reason is that I’m finding that as my interest and skill in photography increases, the teeny, tiny little center column of this website was too small for me to really display the photos of which I’m proudest. It also gives me a little more freedom and fun in designing the mastheads; I’m particularly proud of this one.

There are some other changes afoot, and then, I promise, the form of this site will stay static for quite some time to come. I’ll go ahead and apologize to those of you who’ve been *slightly* inconvenienced, particularly those of you using 1024×768 monitors. You’ll notice that there’s a small scroll bar at the bottom of your screen, but don’t worry; you’re really missing only like 4 pixels on either side of the screen. Though if you do use this as impetus to go get a new monitor, well - you take this site much more seriously than I do.

Anyway, I’m toying with introducing a "Daily Photo" post, as I am taking more than enough pictures to warrant such a thing, and if and when I do (it sorta requires I get my own SLR and stop ganking the one from work), it’ll show up in the menu bar.

Anyway, enough shop talk. Did you see that Barack’s ahead of Hillary by over 10 points in New Hampshire? Good news!

Interweb, Everyday Comments (0)

« Previous PageNext Page »